International Journal for Educational Integrity volume 13, Article number: 3 ( 2017 ) | Download Citation
Many strategies have now been proposed to deal with the usage Essay Mills as well as other ‘contract cheating services that are students. These services generally offer bespoke custom-written essays or other assignments to students in return for a fee. There has been calls for the usage legal ways to tackle the difficulty. Here we see whether the united kingdom Fraud Act (2006) might be used to tackle some of the activities of companies providing these types of services into the UK, by comparing their practises that are common and their Terms and Conditions, aided by the Act. We unearthed that all of the sites examined have paid papers disclaimers about the use of their products but there are numerous contradictions that are obvious the actions for the sites which undermine these disclaimers, for example all sites offer plagiarism-free guarantees for the job and at least eight have advertising which appears to contradict their terms and conditions. We identify possible areas in which the Act could be used to pursue a case that is legal overall conclude that such an approach is unlikely to be effective. We call for a new offence to be created in UK law which specifically targets the undesirable behaviours of these companies into the UK, although the principles might be applied elsewhere. We also highlight other UK legal approaches that may be much more successful.
The usage so-called ‘contract cheating’ services by students happens to be a way to obtain controversy and debate within Higher Education, particularly when you look at the last decade. ‘Contract cheating’ refers, basically, into the outsourcing of assessments by students, to third parties who complete focus on their behalf in substitution for a fee or other benefit (Lancaster and Clarke 2016). Continue reading “Are Essay Mills fraud that is committing? An analysis of these behaviours vs the 2006 Fraud Act (UK)”